IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences
2021, Volume 1, Issue 1 : 41-45
Original Article
Constraint to use Modern animal processing technologies in Amosun Abattoir Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Oct. 27, 2021
Accepted
Nov. 20, 2021
Published
Nov. 30, 2021
Abstract

The study investigates the constraints to use modern animal processing technologies in the study area. Multi-stage sampling techniques were used to collect 112 respondents through a well-structured questionnaire in the study area. The objectives were addressed using descriptive statistics while inferential statistics such as Pearson product moment correlation (PPMC) were used to test hypothesis. The results show that majority (100%) of respondents were male who engaged in animal slaughtering in the abattoir, 90.1% were married with 32,43% of age range 30-39 years and 45% had their primary school leaving certificate ass their level of education background in the study area. Result also revealed that availability of modern animal processing technologies were 100% ranging from Stunning machine, Bleeding machine, Effluent management, Skinning machine, Evisceration and viscera inspection, Splitting machine, Solid waste, Transportation, Security, Lairage, Cold room and Washing equipment in the study area.  Result further revealed that 71.2% of the respondents had illiteracy as severe constraint while 88.3% of respondents had Culture barrier, 77.5% had inadequate transportation from the abattoir site to market in the city, 68,5% had Religious barrier and 62.2% had fluctuation of electricity as mild constraints in the study area. The result of analysis revealed that there is a negatively inverse significant relationship between constraints and utilization of modern animal processing technologies among butchers in the study area. It is therefore, recommended that Government should enact laws and regulations that will make non-compliance with utilization of modern animal processing technologies a punishable offence in the study area.

 

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Although, the information on the number of livestock animals that are reared in each of the system could not be accessed, predominantly among small scale farmers is the extensive system and it is also called the free range system. In  Nigeria, cattle  are reared  primarily for meat which  is a veritable source of  protein for human and  for milk such  as found with government aided industries like Kano dairy farm noted for large scale production for milk, yoghurt etc. in the 80s, hides and skins, bones hooves etc. all of which serves as raw materials for some agro allied industries. These industries serve as income and employment opportunities for the people wherever they exist.

 

In recent years, there is increased global consumption of meat, poultry and dairy products. It is estimated that per capital consumption in developing countries of livestock products could rise by as much as 40% by 2030 [1]. Income, population movements, education, preferences and lifestyles are critical factors affecting dietary patterns. Throughout the world, there is currently major shift from consumption of basic staple diets towards more diversified diets with milk and other livestock products, fruits vegetables and processed foods are on increasing demand [2]. Meat is defined as the freshly dressed or processed tissues, mainly skeletal muscles from warm-blooded animals suitable for use for food [3]. Meat is a good source of essential nutrients required for growth and development, and one of the most important sources of high quality protein, vitamins and mineral [4].

 

An abattoir is defined as a special facility designed and licensed for receiving, holding, slaughtering and inspecting meat animals and meat products before release to the public for consumption [5]. In modern meat procedures, most of the processing steps are usually mechanized. The meat machines are designed for long lasting, high functionality, simple cleaning, highest hygiene, safety and easily operation. Modern machines includes top quality likes knives, clippers, blades, shears, hand saws and some others mechanical equipment that are designed to give the best productivity for beef, goat, lamb slaughter and other eating animals [6].

 

However, the processing of animal meat in Nigeria is generally by traditional method, animals are slaughtered on floors outside the abattoir facility by butchers whose knowledge about hygiene is poor. It is against this background that the study is to investigate the constraints to use modern animal processing technologies in the study area.

 

Specific objectives

The specific objectives of this study include to:

 

·        Identify socio-economic characteristics of respondents in the study area.

·        Describe availability of modern animal processing technologies among respondents in the study area.

·        Determine constraints militating against the utilization of respondents of the modern animal processing technologies in the study area

 

Hypothesis of the study

The hypothesis stated in the null form is tested:

 

H01: there is no significant relationship between constraint and utilization of modern animal processing technologies among respondents in the study area.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in Akinyele Local Government area of Oyo State. Akinyele is one of the eleven Local Government that make up Ibadan metropolis with its headquarters area at Moniya. It created in 1976 and shares boundaries with Afijio Local Government to the North, Lagelu Local Government area to East, Ido Local Government area to the West and Ibadan North Local Government area to the South, It occupies a land area of 464,892 square kilometers with a population density of 516 persons per square kilometer. Using 3.2% growth rate from 2006 census figures, the 2010 estimated population for the Local Government is 239,745 people [7].

 

Sampling Procedure and Sample size

Multi-stage sampling techniques were used for this study. First stage is Purposive sampling of Identification of cattle butchers Second stage is the random selection of butchers using modern technology working in the abattoir. Third stage is the random selection of 53.5% butchers to give a total of 112 respondents used for the study.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

Table 1: Socio-economic characteristics of the respondents

Variables

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Sex

 

 

Male

111

100.0

Female

0

0

Age

 

 

20 – 29

20

18.02

30 – 39

36

32.43

40 – 49

35

31.53

50 – 59

17

15.32

60 and above

3

2.70

Marital status

 

 

Single

9

8.10

Married

100

90.10

Divorced

2

1.80

Education background

 

 

No Formal education

18

16.20

Primary education

50

45.00

Secondary education

35

31.50

Tertiary education

8

7.20

Tribe

 

 

Yoruba

108

97.30

Igbo

3

2.70

Hausa

0

0

Religion

 

 

Christianity

27

24.30

Islam

84

75.70

Membership of Association

 

 

Yes

108

97.30

No

3

2.70

Total

111

100.0

Source: computed from researcher’s survey data

 

The results show that majority (100%) of respondents were male who engaged in animal slaughtering in the abattoir, 90.1% were married with 32,43% of age range 30-39 years and 45% had their primary school leaving certificate ass their level of education background in the study area. This implies that majority of the respondents are mature, which in support of findings by Akinbile [8] who reported that marriage confers responsibility and send signal that they are mature and versatile even responsible. Also the result is in tandem with Oladele [9] who stated that exposure of people to education will increased their ability to adopt changes. The result further revealed that majority 95.7% of respondents were Yoruba’s and few were Igbo’s. This indicated that Yoruba’s dominated the study area as it falls in south west region of Nigeria. Furthermore, the result shows that majority 75.7% of respondents were practicing Islam while 24.3% were practicing Christianity as their Religion in the study area, with 97.3% of respondents belongs to association while 2.3% does not belong to any association in the study area. The implication is that majority of respondents share a common goal/ ideas in the study area.

 

Table 2: Availability of Modern animal Processing technologies in the study area

Modern Animal Processing technologies

Available (f) (%)

Not Available (f) (%)

Stunning machine

111  (100.0)

0

Bleeding machine

111  (100.0)

0

Effluent management

111  (100.0)

0

Skinning machine

111  (100.0)

0

Evisceration and viscera inspection

111  (100.0)

0

Splitting machine

111  (100.0)

0

Solid waste

111  (100.0)

0

Transportation

111  (100.0)

0

Market

107  (96.4)

4  (3.6)

Laboratory

26  (23.4)

85 (76.6)

Security

111  (100.0)

0

Lairage

111  (100.0)

0

Cold room

111  (100.0)

0

Washing equipment

111  (100.0)

0

Source: computed from researcher’s survey data

 

Result of analysis in table 2 also revealed that availability of modern animal processing technologies were 100% ranging from Stunning machine, Bleeding machine, Effluent management, Skinning machine, Evisceration and viscera inspection, Splitting machine, Solid waste, Transportation, Security, Lairage, Cold room and Washing equipment in the study area. The implication is that almost modern animal processing technologies were available in the study area.

 

Table 3: Constraints to use Modern animal processing technologies in the study area

Constraints

Severe Constraints

Mild Constraints

Not a Constraints

Illiteracy

79 (71.2)

31 (27.9)

1 (0.9)

High cost of modern processing

35 (31.5)

48 (43.2)

28 (25.2)

Unfavorable Government Policy

34 (30.6)

52 (46.8)

25 (22.5)

Lack of adequate technical know-how

5 (4.5)

19 (17.1)

87 (78.4)

Fluctuation of electricity

13 (11.7)

 

 

Inadequate of Veterinary personnel

1 (0.9)

8 (7.2)

102 (91.9)

Religion barrier

16 (14.4)

76 (68.5)

19 (17.1)

Culture barrier

6 (5.4)

98 (88.3)

7 (6.3)

Lack of adequate information on modern processing technologies

1 (0.9)

23 (20.7)

87 (78.4)

Inadequate transportation from the abattoir site to market in the city

13 (11.7)

86 (77.5)

12 (10.8)

Inadequate waste management

3 (2.7)

7 (6.3)

101 (91.0)

Lack of adequate of standard animal processing

1 (0.9)

3 (2.7)

107 (96.4)

Source: computed from researcher’s survey data

 

Result of analysis in table 3 revealed that 71.2% of the respondents had illiteracy as severe constraint while 88.3% of respondents had Culture barrier, 77.5% had inadequate transportation from the abattoir site to market in the city, 68,5% had Religious barrier and 62.2% had fluctuation of electricity as mild constraints in the study area. While 96.4% had Lack of adequate of standard animal processing, 91.9% had Inadequate of Veterinary personnel, 91.0% had Inadequate waste management, 78.4% had Lack of adequate information on modern processing technologies and 78.4% had Lack of adequate technical know-how as not a constraints in the study area.

 

 

Table 4: PPMC showing the relationship between constraint and utilization of modern animal processing technologies among respondents in the study area.

Variables

PPMC

p-value

Decision

Constraints VS

-        0.456

0.000

S

Utilization

 

 

 

 

The result of analysis in table 4 revealed that there is a negatively inverse significant relationship between constraints and utilization of modern animal processing technologies among butchers in the study area. The implication of this is that the higher the constraints to use the modern animal processing technologies the lower the utilization among butchers in the study area. Conversely, the less the constraints to used of modern animal processing technologies, the higher the utilization of modern animal processing technologies among butchers in the study area. Constraint is a significant and fair factors in effecting changes in butchers’ utilization of modern animal processing technologies.

 

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The study investigates the constraints to use modern animal processing technologies in the study area. Results showed that majority of the respondents were male with larger part married and had primary education as their educational background and member of their association.

 

Result also revealed that availability of modern animal processing technologies ranging from Stunning machine, Bleeding machine, Effluent management, Skinning machine, Evisceration and viscera inspection, Splitting machine, Solid waste, Transportation, Security, Lairage, Cold room and Washing equipment in the study area.  Result further revealed that majority of respondents had illiteracy as severe constraint while Culture barrier, inadequate transportation from the abattoir site to market in the city, Religious barrier and  fluctuation of electricity as mild constraints in the study area. The result of analysis revealed that there is a negatively inverse significant relationship between constraints and utilization of modern animal processing technologies among butchers in the study area.

 

Based on empirical findings of the study, the following recommendations were put forward; Government should enact laws and regulations that will make non-compliance with utilization of modern animal processing technologies a punishable offence and also provide more inspecting agents to carry out complete and proper meat inspection in order to facilitate the use of modern animal processing technologies among butchers in the study area.

 

REFERENCES

1.      FAO (2002a). Livestock: intensification and its risks, pp. 58-63 In: World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. Summary report, Rome, Pp. 99.

2.      Delgado, C.L., (2003). Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. J. Nutr., 133: 3907S-3910S.

3.      Alonge, D. O. (2005). Textbook of meat hygiene in the tropics. 2nd ed. Farmcoe press, Ibadan 58Pp.

4.      Speedy, A.W. (2003). Global production and consumption of animal source foods. J. Nutr. 133:4048-4053.

5.      Alonge, D. O. (2005). Meat and Milk hygiene in the tropics. Farmcoe press, Ibadan Nigeria, 77-86.

6.      Food Standard Agency (2015). FSA compliance with EU & GB charging rules….December FSA legal confirm meat costs are consistent.

7.      National Population Commission (2006). Population figure, Federal Republic of Nigeria, Abuja. Retrieved from http://www.npc.gov

8.      Akinbile (2007).Multi-agency partnerships in West-African Agriculture, A review and Description of rice production systems in Nigeria. Eco-system Development Organization (EDO) Report.

Oladele, O.I. (2005). A Tobit Analysis of Propensity to Discontinue Adoption of Agricultural Technology among Farmers in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Central Euro.Agric. 6(3): 249-254.

Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Morphological characterization of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] land race collected from western and south-western part of Ethiopia for DUS Traits
2022, Volume 2, Issue 1 : 11-29
Research Article Open Access
Review on the Fungal Diseases of Mushroom: Etiology, Symptoms and Control
2022, Volume 2, Issue 1 : 30-38
Research Article Open Access
The role of agricultural extension in the production and marketing of the olive crop in Ismailia Governorate
2022, Volume 2, Issue 2 : 4-18
Research Article Open Access
An Explorative Survey on Challenges Facing Citrus Farmers in Makueni County, Kenya
2022, Volume 2, Issue 1 : 1-10
IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences journal thumbnail
Volume 1, Issue 1
Citations
7 Views
48 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IASR J Agri Life Science open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences
About Us
IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences (IJALS) is a peer-reviewed international academic journal established in 2021, dedicated to the publication of or…
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright IASR International LLP. All articles published in IASR Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences (IJALS) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.